Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (2) TMI 114

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....etitioner seeks to lay challenge to an order of assessment dated March 29, 1995, passed by the Income-tax Officer, and the order dated February 21, 1997, passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) whereby he has set aside the assessment order dated March 29, 1995, and sent the matter back for assessment afresh. A preliminary objection has been raised to the maintainability of the writ peti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d circumstances of the case the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) should have annulled the assessment proceedings instead of directing a remand. Learned counsel also submitted that the petitioner is seeking a writ of certiorari wherein the bar of availability of alternate remedy is not attracted and the impugned order of assessment having been framed in violation of the principles of natural ju....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Learned senior standing counsel for the respondent has submitted that the present one is not a case where the order of assessment can be annulled. The order of remand was justified and it is only in a very limited category of cases where the power to annul an assessment can be exercised by the appellate authority, such as one, where the assessment is void ab initio, which the order in the case a....