<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (2) TMI 114 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17157</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging income tax assessment orders, citing the availability of an alternative remedy through an appeal to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The court held that the case did not warrant the exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction and granted the petitioner the liberty to file an appeal, allowing for condonation of delay under the Limitation Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:22:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (2) TMI 114 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17157</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petition challenging income tax assessment orders, citing the availability of an alternative remedy through an appeal to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The court held that the case did not warrant the exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction and granted the petitioner the liberty to file an appeal, allowing for condonation of delay under the Limitation Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>