2019 (2) TMI 1180
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....-2019<br>Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19805 of 20 - -<br>Service Tax<br>Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran And Mr. Justice Arvind Srivastava For the Petitioner : Mr.D.V. Pathy, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr.Anjani Kumar Sharan, ASG ORDER The petitioner questions the order dated 27.06.2018 impugned at Annexure-6 passed by the respondent No. 1 confirming the demand of service tax for the period 2....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Mr. Sharan has invited our attention to the order impugned at Annexure-6 to demonstrate that there is application of mind by the authority to reject the claim so put forth. According to Mr. Sharan all the issues as raised by Mr. Pathy have been dealt and if the petitioner is not satisfied it can be raised by the petitioner in the statutory appeal so available under the Finance Act. We are in....
TaxTMI