<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1180 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375553</link>
    <description>Where an efficacious statutory appeal is available against an order confirming service tax demand, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be exercised to examine the merits of the assessment challenge. The Court noted that objections concerning the show cause notice and alleged non-consideration of exemption notifications could be pursued before the appellate authority, and therefore declined to entertain the writ petition on merits. It nevertheless granted time to file an appeal, directed the appellate authority to consider any condonation request on its own merits without prejudice, and restrained coercive recovery for the intervening period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 06:19:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=559161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1180 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375553</link>
      <description>Where an efficacious statutory appeal is available against an order confirming service tax demand, writ jurisdiction will ordinarily not be exercised to examine the merits of the assessment challenge. The Court noted that objections concerning the show cause notice and alleged non-consideration of exemption notifications could be pursued before the appellate authority, and therefore declined to entertain the writ petition on merits. It nevertheless granted time to file an appeal, directed the appellate authority to consider any condonation request on its own merits without prejudice, and restrained coercive recovery for the intervening period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=375553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>