2019 (1) TMI 1383

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Dilip Shinde, Assistant Commissioner (AR), for respondent ORDER Per: S.K. Mohanty This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 7.2.2014 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-V, wherein service tax demand of Rs. 23,95,850/- was confirmed along with interest and penalties were imposed under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The service tax demand was c....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....from October 2010 to March 2011 and the position of law remains the same, the said decision of the Tribunal is squarely applicable for deciding the appeal in favour of the appellant. 3. On the other hand, the learned AR appearing for Revenue reiterated the findings in the impugned order. 4. Heard both sides and perused the case records. 5. On perusal of the impugned order, we find that th....