<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (1) TMI 1383 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374218</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order confirming a service tax demand for &#039;business auxiliary service&#039;, &#039;management, maintenance or repair service&#039;, and &#039;health and fitness service&#039; for the period October 2010 to March 2011. The Tribunal found that a previous decision in a similar case favored the appellant, and as the legal position should apply consistently, the impugned order lacked merit and was overturned in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2019 07:24:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=555419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (1) TMI 1383 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374218</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order confirming a service tax demand for &#039;business auxiliary service&#039;, &#039;management, maintenance or repair service&#039;, and &#039;health and fitness service&#039; for the period October 2010 to March 2011. The Tribunal found that a previous decision in a similar case favored the appellant, and as the legal position should apply consistently, the impugned order lacked merit and was overturned in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=374218</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>