Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

1914 (7) TMI 1

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....>Indian Laws<br>JUDGMENT 1. We must follow the Privy Council Ruling in Bakhtawar Begam v. Husaini Khanaum I.L.R. (1913) A. 195. 26 M.L.J. 474 and if there are some observations in Rose Ammal v. Raj....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....act in this case. The usufructuary mortgagees (plaintiffs) are therefore entitled to remain in possession for the seven years term agreed upon between themselves and the mortgagors and hence they cann....

PrevPreviousNextNext