1914 (7) TMI 1
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... We must follow the Privy Council Ruling in Bakhtawar Begam v. Husaini Khanaum I.L.R. (1913) A. 195. 26 M.L.J. 474 and if there are some observations in Rose Ammal v. Rajaratna Ammal I.L.R. (1898) M. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....uary mortgagees (plaintiffs) are therefore entitled to remain in possession for the seven years term agreed upon between themselves and the mortgagors and hence they cannot be redeemed by the appellan....




TaxTMI
TaxTMI