<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1914 (7) TMI 1 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278174</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the usufructuary mortgagees, following the principle that a mortgagor cannot redeem the mortgagee before the specified term without a contract permitting it. As there was no evidence of such a contract, the court dismissed the appeal with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 1914 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2019 11:47:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=553203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1914 (7) TMI 1 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278174</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of the usufructuary mortgagees, following the principle that a mortgagor cannot redeem the mortgagee before the specified term without a contract permitting it. As there was no evidence of such a contract, the court dismissed the appeal with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 1914 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=278174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>