Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

1998 (7) TMI 42

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....BABU J.---The Revenue wants to blow hot and cold. It contended in a case concerning the same assessee in respect of an earlier assessment year that the investment held by it is stock-in-trade. It now wants to contend to the contrary and claim that investment made by the assessee-bank is not stock-in-trade. The contention of the Revenue with regard to the nature of the investment made by the ban....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... is stock-in-trade as the bank had the option of either maintaining a cash reserve or holding the money in investments. This court also in the course of the order made in the earlier tax case, referred with approval to the decision of the Karnataka High Court in the case of Karnataka Bank Ltd. v. CIT [1978] 114 ITR 421 and after referring to the Full Bench of this court in the case of CIT v. Madra....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....h approval by this court, and held that the change in the method of valuation of the investment was permissible, as the assessee had the option of valuing the investment at cost or at market price. The fact that the assessee had adopted the cost price in earlier years, but chose to change that mode of valuation to the market price was not in any way contrary to the requirements of the Act. No exce....