Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the investment held by a banking company to satisfy the reserve requirements under section 24 of the Banking Regulation Act constituted stock-in-trade, whether the profit on redemption of such securities was assessable as business profit, and whether the assessee could change the method of valuing its investments from cost to market price.
Analysis: The Court noted that the nature of the assessee-bank's investments had already been examined in earlier proceedings involving the same assessee and that, after considering the statutory obligation under section 24 of the Banking Regulation Act and the relevant judicial authorities, the investments were held to form part of the bank's stock-in-trade. On that basis, the profit arising on redemption of securities was treated as business income and not as capital gains. The Court also accepted that, in respect of valuation of investments, the assessee had the option to adopt either cost or market value, and a change from one recognised method to the other was not contrary to the Act.
Conclusion: The investment was stock-in-trade, the redemption profit was taxable as business profit, and the change in valuation method was permissible; the Revenue's contrary reference sought to be raised was therefore rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Securities held by a bank to meet its statutory reserve obligations may constitute stock-in-trade, and a recognised change in valuation method from cost to market price is permissible where it accords with the Act.