Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (12) TMI 704

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellant Mr. Madhur Agrawal a/w Mr. P.C. Tripathi i/by Raj Darak for the Respondent   P.C.: 1. Income Tax Appeal No. 883 of 2016 is not on board. As the said appeal involves the same assessee and identical question of law as in Income Tax Appeal No. 842 of 2016 which is on board today, by consent of both the learned counsel, we have taken Income Tax Appeal No. 883 of 2016 on board al....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ure is two fold. Firstly, as per the Revenue, the assessee had in its books of accounts treated the expenditure as "capital work-in-progress" and secondly, according to the Revenue, the expenditure was in the nature of 'pre-operative expenditure' and therefore, should have been capitalized. 4. The Tribunal, by the impugned order, overruled both the objections of the Revenue. With respec....