Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2018 (12) TMI 705

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....; P.C.: 1. This Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), challenges the common order dated 14th August, 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). This impugned order dated 14th August, 2015 is common order in respect of this respondent and Shreeji Exhibitors. This Appeal relates to Assessment Year 2009-10. 2. The Revenue urges the following questio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing Officer by his Assessment order dated 28th December, 2011 passed under Section 143(3) of the Act, did not accept the same and the income earned on letting out of commercial premises was classified under the head "Income from house property".   5. Being aggrieved, the respondent filed an appeal to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)). By an order dated 26th December, 2012 dis....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....om letting out of premises is classified as "Income from business or profession". 7. Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the Revenue submits that the facts in the case of present respondent are different from the facts in the case of Shreeji Exhibitors. Thus, it is submitted that the impugned order of the Tribunal could not have applied the ratio of its decision in the case of Shree Exhibitors ....