Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (12) TMI 489

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... was filed before the Commissioner (Appeals). The Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) the appeal concurring with the adjudicating authority upheld the order in original and rejected the appeal, therefore the present appeal. 2. Shri. Nazir Shaikh, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that though the shortage was found in finished goods and raw material but that is due to accounting mistake and miss-handling of the goods by their worker. As per the nature of the process and goods there is spillage of goods at every stage i.e. due to unloading, shifting from one place to other during blending and packing and shortage also due to evaporation of the goods being a petroleum product, therefore, the shortage over a field of long perio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....VS. NIPON ZIP INDUSTRY PVT. LTD. 2009 (236) E.L.T 554 (Tri. Mumbai) • SAILASH AMULAKH JOGANI VS UNION OF INDIA- 2009 (241) E.L.T. 348 (BOM.) • DR. WRITER'S FOOD PRODUCTS VS C.C.E., PUNE-ll- 2009 (242) E.L.T. 381 (Tri. MUM.) • NASHIK STRIPS PVT. LTD. VS C.C.E., NASHIK- 2010 (256) E.L.T 307 (Tri. Mum.) • C.C.E. LUDHINAN VS NARAIN DASS-2011 (273) E.L.T 251 (Tri. Del.) • C.C.E., INDORE VS SOURABH POLYPLAST PVT. LTD.- 2011 (266) E.L.T 62 (Tri. Del.) 3. Shri. S.N.Gohil Ld. Superintendent (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the finding of the impugned order. He submits that this is admitted shortage in the cause of Physical stock taking by the departmental Officers.....