https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371720 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand on the shortage of finished goods and raw material. It found no evidence of clandestine removal, accepting the explanation of spillage and evaporation over time. The decision was influenced by the manager's statement and previous Tribunal precedent requiring corroborating evidence for such allegations. The appellant successfully argued against the Revenue's position based on the lack of supporting evidence and the nature of the goods involved. en-us Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Dec 2018 09:37:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371720 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand on the shortage of finished goods and raw material. It found no evidence of clandestine removal, accepting the explanation of spillage and evaporation over time. The decision was influenced by the manager's statement and previous Tribunal precedent requiring corroborating evidence for such allegations. The appellant successfully argued against the Revenue's position based on the lack of supporting evidence and the nature of the goods involved. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=371720