TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2017 (8) TMI 1487
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Respondent. ORDER A memo of appearance of Sri Tanmoy Chakravarty, Learned Counsel for the respondent filed in Court today is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Tusharkanti Satpathy, Learned Counsel for the Central Excise authorities as well as Sri Chakravarty and Sri Mukesh Panda for the respondent. 3. This appeal has come up to be filed by the Revenue seeking to challenge an Order No. FO....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... direction : "In view of the aforesaid facts, we allow the present OTAPL by setting aside the impugned order dated 23-12-2015 under Annexure-2. Apart from the aforesaid direction, we are of the considered view that if the petitioner deposits a sum of Rs. 2.00 crores (by way of reversal CENVAT credit) within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be accepted as pre-deposit for the purpos....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the appeal filed by the respondent on 23-12-2015. It appears that the respondent being aggrieved by the said order, had challenged the same by filing OTAPL No. 5 of 2016. The Revenue, on the other hand, appeared to have filed a petition for rectification before the CESTAT, which came to be rejected by order dated 8-8-2016 and communicated to the Revenue on 22-8-2016. Sri Satpathy, on behalf of th....