Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2017 (8) TMI 1487

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s. Mukesh Panda, Advocate for the Respondent. ORDER A memo of appearance of Sri Tanmoy Chakravarty, Learned Counsel for the respondent filed in Court today is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Tusharkanti Satpathy, Learned Counsel for the Central Excise authorities as well as Sri Chakravarty and Sri Mukesh Panda for the respondent. 3. This appeal has come up to be filed by the Re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....espondent with the following observation and direction : "In view of the aforesaid facts, we allow the present OTAPL by setting aside the impugned order dated 23-12-2015 under Annexure-2. Apart from the aforesaid direction, we are of the considered view that if the petitioner deposits a sum of Rs. 2.00 crores (by way of reversal CENVAT credit) within a period of two weeks from today, the same s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the fact that the CESTAT at EZB, Kolkata disposed of the appeal filed by the respondent on 23-12-2015. It appears that the respondent being aggrieved by the said order, had challenged the same by filing OTAPL No. 5 of 2016. The Revenue, on the other hand, appeared to have filed a petition for rectification before the CESTAT, which came to be rejected by order dated 8-8-2016 and communicated to the....