<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1487 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276315</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal as infructuous due to the setting aside of the original CESTAT order in the respondent&#039;s appeal. The lack of communication regarding the respondent&#039;s appeal, rejection of the rectification petition, and the High Court&#039;s previous order all contributed to this decision. The appeal was deemed unnecessary and maintainability was questioned by the respondent, leading to its dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 07:12:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1487 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276315</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal as infructuous due to the setting aside of the original CESTAT order in the respondent&#039;s appeal. The lack of communication regarding the respondent&#039;s appeal, rejection of the rectification petition, and the High Court&#039;s previous order all contributed to this decision. The appeal was deemed unnecessary and maintainability was questioned by the respondent, leading to its dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>