2002 (1) TMI 1326

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al Sessions Judge while invoking his jurisdiction under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code and granting anticipatory bail to the accused, which condition was affirmed by the High Court. Be it stated that an FIR having been lodged alleging commission of an offence by the appellant under Sections 406/ 420 of Indian Penal Code, the appellant moved the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ward the same along with the challan, whenever it is filed in the Court. The accused being aggrieved by the condition requiring to deposit the sum of Rs. 15 lacs, moved the High Court. The High Court by the impugned order having affirmed the same, the accused has moved this Court. 3. The contention of the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant is that notwithstanding the fact that under Se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on (1) of Section 438. In support of this contention, reliance was placed on a decision of this Court in Sandeep Jain v. National Capital Territory of Delhi, . The learned Counsel appearing for the State, on the other hand objected to the variation of the condition, particularly when according to the learned Counsel the accused himself conceded to the amount being kept in deposit. From the order o....