<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1326 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276263</link>
    <description>Conditions attached to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC must be reasonable and capable of compliance; an onerous or impossible condition can effectively amount to denial of relief. The Supreme Court held that requiring deposit of an FDR of Rs. 15 lakhs as a precondition for anticipatory bail was unreasonable and not warranted on the facts. The impugned condition was set aside, and anticipatory bail was made available subject to substituted conditions imposed by the Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2018 16:23:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=540702" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1326 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276263</link>
      <description>Conditions attached to anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC must be reasonable and capable of compliance; an onerous or impossible condition can effectively amount to denial of relief. The Supreme Court held that requiring deposit of an FDR of Rs. 15 lakhs as a precondition for anticipatory bail was unreasonable and not warranted on the facts. The impugned condition was set aside, and anticipatory bail was made available subject to substituted conditions imposed by the Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>