2018 (10) TMI 1248

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dicial) Sh. B. K. Singh, Advocate for the appellant Sh. H. C. Saini, AR for the Respondent ORDER Per: V. Padmanabhan: The present ROM applications are filed against the Final Order No.50175 - 50176/2018 dated 12.01.2018. 2. Heard Shri B. K. Singh, Id. Advocate for the appellant and Sh. H. C. Saini, ld. AR for the Revenue. 3. Ld. Advocate pointed out the following errors in the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hich merits classification under CETH 24039920, to which the Compounded Levy Scheme is not applicable. iii) Ld. Advocate submitted that the appellant has claimed that first machine was installed in June, 2013 and second one was installed two months later. He prayed that the Tribunal may remand the matter to the adjudicating authority to verify whether there was any manufacturing activity by the....