<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 1248 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369282</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for duty on tobacco products manufactured by the appellant from June 2013 onwards. For the period January to May 2013, the issue was remanded to verify manufacturing activity. The appellant&#039;s product was classified under CETH 24039920, not covered by the Compounded Levy Scheme. The Tribunal dismissed the Review of Modification applications, emphasizing the settled legal position on reviewing final orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2018 09:10:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=539359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 1248 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369282</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for duty on tobacco products manufactured by the appellant from June 2013 onwards. For the period January to May 2013, the issue was remanded to verify manufacturing activity. The appellant&#039;s product was classified under CETH 24039920, not covered by the Compounded Levy Scheme. The Tribunal dismissed the Review of Modification applications, emphasizing the settled legal position on reviewing final orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=369282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>