2018 (10) TMI 633

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt : Shri Jatin Mahajan (Advocate) For the Respondent : Shri Sandeep Kumar Singh (Dy. Commr.) AR ORDER PER: ANIL CHOUDHARY The above stated appeals are arising out of five impugned Orders-in-Appeal detailed in chart below and having a common issue. Therefore, they are taken up together for disposal. S. No. Appeal No. Party Name Order-in-Appeal Order-inOriginal SCN dat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....2010 June 09 - Sep 09 D - 4,89,111/- P - 4,89,111/- 7. E/1427/2011 Do Do 54(MP)2010 Dated 27.09.2010 15.04.2010 Oct 09 - Dec 09 D - 2,27,936/- P - 2,27,936/- 8. E/1431/2011 Do 52/CE/ALLD/2011 Dated 31.03.2011 07(MP)2010 Dated 24.01.2010 25.05.2009 Jun 08 - July 08 D - 4,01,890/- P - 4,01,890/- 2. The brief facts of the case are that, the ap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... inapplicable. Therefore, the appellants were issued with various show cause notices demanding Central Excise duty on intermediate product 'sugar syrup' captively consumed in the manufacture of biscuits. The said show cause notices were adjudicated through various Order-in-Originals where the demands were confirmed. Aggrieved by the said Order-in-Originals, the appellants preferred appeals before ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lowed appeals by setting aside the impugned Order-in-Appeals in the said appeals. 4. Heard the learned AR who has agreed that the present appeals are squarely covered by Final Order of this Tribunal in above stated case. 5. Having considered the submissions made from both sides and on perusal of record, we find that this Tribunal in the said case of M/s Bhagwati Food Pvt. Ltd. and others (su....