<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 633 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368667</link>
    <description>An intermediate sugar syrup used captively in biscuit manufacture was treated as not liable to central excise duty because no evidence showed that it was marketable. The Tribunal followed earlier coordinate-bench reasoning that excisability of an intermediate product depends on proof that it comes into existence in a marketable form, and that marketability must be established by evidence. On that basis, the captively consumed syrup was held outside duty, with the issue decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 09:48:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=538008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 633 - CESTAT, ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368667</link>
      <description>An intermediate sugar syrup used captively in biscuit manufacture was treated as not liable to central excise duty because no evidence showed that it was marketable. The Tribunal followed earlier coordinate-bench reasoning that excisability of an intermediate product depends on proof that it comes into existence in a marketable form, and that marketability must be established by evidence. On that basis, the captively consumed syrup was held outside duty, with the issue decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368667</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>