2018 (10) TMI 537
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Cardozo I/b Mr. Joel Cardozo for respondent nos. 2 and 3 P.C. 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the order dated 12th February, 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). By the impugned order the petitioner's appeal from the order dated 28th November, 2008 of the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise was dismissed. 2. At th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tioner. This led to the passing of the impugned order, which is admittedly appealable to the Tribunal under the Act. 5. We are of the view that the issue in this petition revolves on the issue of determination of whether hearing was granted before the passing of the impugned order dated 12th February, 2016. Therefore, the same will be appropriately dealt by the Authorities under the Act. Theref....
TaxTMI