<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 537 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368571</link>
    <description>The BOMBAY HIGH COURT dismissed the petition challenging the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) for lack of exhausting the alternative remedy of filing an appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court noted that the impugned order did include personal hearings in 2015, where the petitioner did not appear, leading to the order being passed. The Court emphasized the need to address jurisdictional issues through appropriate channels under the Act. The petitioner was allowed to file an appeal to the Tribunal with a delay condonation application, with the assurance of consideration on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 09:11:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=537826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 537 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368571</link>
      <description>The BOMBAY HIGH COURT dismissed the petition challenging the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals) for lack of exhausting the alternative remedy of filing an appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court noted that the impugned order did include personal hearings in 2015, where the petitioner did not appear, leading to the order being passed. The Court emphasized the need to address jurisdictional issues through appropriate channels under the Act. The petitioner was allowed to file an appeal to the Tribunal with a delay condonation application, with the assurance of consideration on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>