2018 (10) TMI 78
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....- AT (Judgement / Order / Decisions)<br>Dated:- 4-9-2018<br>Appeal Nos.92/2010, E/369 to 372/2010 E/378, 387, 396, 397, 402, 417/2010 - A/87250-87260/2018<br>Central Excise<br>Dr. D.M. Misra, Member (Judicial) And Mr. Sanjiv Srivastava, Member (Technical) Shri D. H. Nadkarni Advocate, Shri V.N. Ansurkar Advocate, Shri S.R. Nair, Consultant, Shri C.S. Biradar Advocate, Shri Arun Mehta Advocate ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....lty under Rule 209A of erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944. On adjudication, the demand was confirmed with interest and penalty. Hence, the present appeals. 3. Ld. Advocate Shri D.H. Nadkarni for the appellants has submitted that on carrying out necessary test of the samples drawn from the factory premises of the appellants; out of ten samples, eight samples were certified to be of 100% cotton....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....gs of the Ld. Commissioner. He has submitted that inspite of sufficient opportunities allowed to the appellants to collect the documents, the same were not collected. 5. In his rejoinder, rebutting the said charge, the Ld. Advocate has submitted that the appellants have entered into correspondence from time to time for supply of these documents and brought to the notice of the authorities that ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ages 285 to 289), and the appellants would bear the necessary copying charges as agreed by the Ld. Advocate Consequently, we direct the department to supply all these documents within one months from the date of communication of this order and thereafter the appellants should file their reply to the notice within one months from the date of receipt of the relevant documents. Ld. Advocate assured t....
TaxTMI