<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (10) TMI 78 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368112</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand, directing the department to provide the necessary documents to the appellants within one month for their defense. The appellants were required to submit their reply within one month of receiving the documents, with a commitment to actively participate in the adjudication process. The Tribunal expected the denovo proceeding to conclude within four months from the order date, keeping all issues open for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 08:19:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (10) TMI 78 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368112</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals by way of remand, directing the department to provide the necessary documents to the appellants within one month for their defense. The appellants were required to submit their reply within one month of receiving the documents, with a commitment to actively participate in the adjudication process. The Tribunal expected the denovo proceeding to conclude within four months from the order date, keeping all issues open for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>