2018 (9) TMI 1761

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ar and Ms. Rashmi Singh, Advs. SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax, 1961 ('Act' for short) in the case of M/s. Mary Kay Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd. ('respondent - assessee' for short) pertains to the Assessment Year 2010-11 and impugns the order dated 28th March, 2018 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ('Tribunal' for short). ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ethod with Operating Costs/Total Cost as the Profit Level Indicator to determine the Arm's Length Price for (i) purchase of finished goods and (ii) purchase of products for business and applied Comparable Uncontrolled Price Method to determine Arm's Length Price for (iii) reimbursement of expenses as per details given below: S.No Description of the transactions Amount (in Rs.) (a) P....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of M/s Hindustan Unilever of 13.14 per cent, M/s Jyothy Laboratories of 7.4 per cent and M/s Surya Vinayak of 0.09 percent. Accordingly, transfer pricing addition of Rs. 2,28,76,787/- was made. In alternative, the Assessing Officer held that the expenditure incurred by the respondent-assessee on advertisement and sales promotion of Rs. 2,28,76,787/- was not allowable under Section 37(1) of the Ac....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dent-assessee is entitled to deduction of advertisement and sales promotion expenses under Section 37(1) of the Act is covered against the Revenue by decision of this Court in Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax - III, (2015) 374 ITR 118 (Delhi) and Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Whirlpool of India Ltd., (2016) 381 ITR 154 (Delhi). In Sony Ericsson Mo....