<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1761 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368025</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding transfer pricing adjustments on advertisement and sales promotion expenses was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld that the expenses were allowable under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing their role in marketing activities. The &quot;Bright Line Method&quot; for determining arm&#039;s length price was rejected, aligning with past decisions. Comparisons with prior cases supported the deduction of such expenses. The Court ruled in favor of the respondent-assessee, noting consistency with established precedents and the assessee&#039;s business closure in India due to losses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=536470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1761 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368025</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding transfer pricing adjustments on advertisement and sales promotion expenses was dismissed. The Tribunal upheld that the expenses were allowable under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing their role in marketing activities. The &quot;Bright Line Method&quot; for determining arm&#039;s length price was rejected, aligning with past decisions. Comparisons with prior cases supported the deduction of such expenses. The Court ruled in favor of the respondent-assessee, noting consistency with established precedents and the assessee&#039;s business closure in India due to losses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=368025</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>