Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (9) TMI 160

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Sr. GM) For Respondent: Shri k.J. Kinariwala (AR) ORDER Per: Ramesh Nair The issue involved in the present case is that whether the demand under Rule 6 is sustainable in case cenvat credit is availed in respect of input, input services and capital goods against the manufacturing of goods on job work basis under Notification No. 214/86-CE dated 25/03/1986. 2. Shri manohar Maheshwari ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... (Tri.Ahmd.) รขโ‚ฌยข Polycab Industries Vs. CCE, Daman 2010 (19) STR 585 (Tri.Ahmd.) รขโ‚ฌยข CCE, Vadodara-l Vs. J.H. Kharawala (p) Ltd 2009 (235) ELT 322 (Tri.Ahmd.) 3. On the other hand Shri k J Kinariwala Ld. Assistant Commissioner (AR) appearing on behalf of the Revenue reiterates the finding of the impugned order. 4. We have carefully considered the submission made by both....