https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366424 The Tribunal held that the demand under Rule 6 for availing cenvat credit in manufacturing goods on a job work basis under Notification No. 214/86-CE is not sustainable. Citing Rule 3 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and previous Tribunal decisions, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals. The judgment underscores the significance of interpreting rules and precedents in determining the admissibility of cenvat credit in similar cases. en-us Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Sep 2018 07:32:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366424 The Tribunal held that the demand under Rule 6 for availing cenvat credit in manufacturing goods on a job work basis under Notification No. 214/86-CE is not sustainable. Citing Rule 3 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and previous Tribunal decisions, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeals. The judgment underscores the significance of interpreting rules and precedents in determining the admissibility of cenvat credit in similar cases. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=366424