TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2018 (8) TMI 564
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... - -<br>Service Tax<br>Mr. N.M. Jamdar And Mr. Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ. For The Petitioner : Mr. C.A. Ferreira, with Mr. Rajiva Srivastava, Advocate For The Respondents : Ms. Asha Dessai, Standing Counsel ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per N.M. Jamdar, J.) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The respondents waive service. Taken up for final disposal. 2. The Petitioner has challenged the order dated ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....t of Rs. 1120101/- made by the Petitioner was wrongly referred in the record of the Authorities as Rs. 120101/-, and it is because of a typographical error in the record of the Respondents, the further liabilities have arisen for the Petitioner. 5. A reply affidavit has been filed by the Assistant Commissioner, wherein a preliminary objection has been taken by the Respondent that the Petitioner h....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ira submits that the Petitioner, in fact, had sought such a rectification within the period of two years as stipulated, on 20 August 2016. The learned Counsel has relied upon a the letter of 20 August 2016 which is annexed at Exhibit "F" to the Petition. 6. We have gone through the document dated 20 August 2016. In the second para of the document, the Petitioner had called upon the Authorities to....