<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 564 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365092</link>
    <description>The Court directed the Respondent-Authority to decide on the representation dated 20 August 2016 within eight weeks, considering the details provided by the Petitioner for rectification of the typographical error in the service tax installment adjustment order. The Court made the rule absolute without imposing costs, emphasizing the Petitioner&#039;s circumstances as a cancer patient at the time of filing the rectification application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2018 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=530264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 564 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365092</link>
      <description>The Court directed the Respondent-Authority to decide on the representation dated 20 August 2016 within eight weeks, considering the details provided by the Petitioner for rectification of the typographical error in the service tax installment adjustment order. The Court made the rule absolute without imposing costs, emphasizing the Petitioner&#039;s circumstances as a cancer patient at the time of filing the rectification application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=365092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>