2006 (9) TMI 160
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....No. 14558/2006 and C.M. No. 11432/2006 The petitioner has impugned the order dated May 18, 2005, of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India whereby on consideration of the complaint of the petitioner, written statement of the chartered accountants, respondent Nos. 2 and 3 and the rejoinder of the petitioner, the Institute Council was prima facie of the opinion that the chartered account....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....cepted the illegal dissolution of partnership firm on the basis of alleged notice of dissolution which was never served on the petitioner and did not bother to ask for an acknowledgment of the receipt of dissolution on behalf of the petitioner and illegally filed the income-tax return of M/s. Anand Super Service Station in two parts, one return having six partners for the period April 1, 2001, to ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ship firm constituted of six partners and it was claimed that the partnership firm stood dissolved on the basis of notice and consequently respondents Nos. 2 and 3 filed the return of the partnership having three partners. While filing the returns, respondents Nos. 2 and 3 were neither to determine nor adjudicate whether the partnership firm was dissolved in accordance with the provisions of the P....
TaxTMI