<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 160 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13770</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, ruling that the chartered accountants were not guilty of professional misconduct in handling income-tax proceedings. The petitioner&#039;s challenge was dismissed, and a refund was ordered for the deposited amount. The court found no grounds for interference under article 226 of the Constitution of India, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition against the Institute&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:21:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 160 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13770</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, ruling that the chartered accountants were not guilty of professional misconduct in handling income-tax proceedings. The petitioner&#039;s challenge was dismissed, and a refund was ordered for the deposited amount. The court found no grounds for interference under article 226 of the Constitution of India, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition against the Institute&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>