Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2018 (7) TMI 1046

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ber, Advocate for Appellants Shri Sandeep Kumar Singh, Deputy Commissioner (AR), for Respondent ORDER Per: Anil G. Shakkarwar The above stated two appeals are arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. NOI-EXCUS-002-APP-1598-17-18 dated 10/01/2018 passed by Commissioner of Central Goods & Service Tax (Appeals), Noida. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants were engaged in th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....show cause notice was adjudicated through Order-in-Original dated 05.02.2016 wherein the said demand was confirmed and Rs. 7,78,472/- + Rs. 15,746/- were appropriated. Further, Rs. 55,922/- was confirmed towards recovery of inadmissible Cenvat credit and equal amount was appropriated. Further, the manufacturer-appellant was imposed with penalty of Rs. 1,27,522/- under Section 11AC of Central Excis....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sion on part of any person about any clandestine removal. He further submitted that there was no method of stock taking of Pet Coke, was also stated in the panchnama. He has further relied on the Final Order issued by this Tribunal in the case of M/s Daya Sugar Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut-I reported at 2017 (358) ELT 1006 (Tri.-All.) wherein at para-8 it was held that the panchnama d....