<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1046 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363738</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals challenging the Order-in-Appeal dated 10/01/2018, which confirmed the demand for Central Excise duty and disallowance of Cenvat credit against a paper manufacturing company. The Tribunal found the panchnama conducted lacked proper stock-taking methods and calculations, rendering the shortages unsubstantiated. Due to this deficiency, the Tribunal deemed the Order-in-Appeal unsustainable and granted consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 06:12:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1046 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363738</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals challenging the Order-in-Appeal dated 10/01/2018, which confirmed the demand for Central Excise duty and disallowance of Cenvat credit against a paper manufacturing company. The Tribunal found the panchnama conducted lacked proper stock-taking methods and calculations, rendering the shortages unsubstantiated. Due to this deficiency, the Tribunal deemed the Order-in-Appeal unsustainable and granted consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>