1972 (2) TMI 107

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Basu and Co. JUDGMENT J.M. Shelat 1. The order of detention impugned in this petition is in identical terms as the one in Writ Petition 322 of 1971. (Ananta Mukhi @ Ananta Hari v. The State of West Bengal). For the reasons given in the judgment in that petition the impugned order must be held to be bad. Consequently, the respondent state is directed to release the petitioner and set him a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....public order, it is necessary so to do, I therefore in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) read with Sub-section 3 of Section 3 of the West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act, 1970(President's Act No. 19 of 1970), make: this order directing that the said Shri Firoj Farukee be detained. Given under my hand and seal of office. Sd/-S.L. Bose 3-5-71. District Ma....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Government and was rejected as per order dated July 1, 1971. The representation was forwarded by the State. Government to the Advisory Board. The Advisory Board sent its report to the State Government on July 8, 1971. Opinion was expressed by the Advisory Board that there was sufficient cause for the detention of the petitioner. The State Government Confirmed the order of detention on July 21, 197....