https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273774 A preventive detention order was not invalid merely because it used the disjunctive expression "security of the State or the maintenance of public order," since the wording did not by itself create uncertainty or show lack of application of mind where the order was referable to statutory power. The challenge of mala fides also failed because the record contained no material supporting such an inference. The detention order was therefore upheld and the habeas corpus petition dismissed. en-us Thu, 03 Feb 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jul 2018 17:21:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273774 A preventive detention order was not invalid merely because it used the disjunctive expression "security of the State or the maintenance of public order," since the wording did not by itself create uncertainty or show lack of application of mind where the order was referable to statutory power. The challenge of mala fides also failed because the record contained no material supporting such an inference. The detention order was therefore upheld and the habeas corpus petition dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Feb 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273774