2018 (5) TMI 554
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....For The Appellant : Ms. Rinki Arora, Advocate For The Respondent : Mr. R. K. Maji, D. R. ORDER PER: B.RAVICHANDRAN The appeal is against order dated 06.07.2011 of Commissioner (Appeals)-I, Jaipur. A Service Tax demand of Rs. 5,32,526/- was confirmed against the appellant for the period 01.07.2003 to 19.07.2005 under the category of errection commissioning service rendered to M/s. IOCL ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....re trying to get details from IOC based on which the present proceedings have initiated. However, the lower authorities proceeded to confirm the demand without any details or material support for such action. 3. We have heard both the sides and perused the appeal records. 4. Neither the original authority nor the first appellate authority has given details of work order and nature of work ex....
TaxTMI