<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 554 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359990</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Service Tax demand of &amp;amp;8377; 5,32,526/- against the appellant for errection commissioning services provided to M/s. IOCL for establishing Petrol Pumps. The Tribunal found that the authorities failed to provide specific work orders or evidence of services rendered, placing the burden of proof incorrectly on the appellant. Emphasizing the principle that the burden of proof rests with the alleging party, the Tribunal deemed the order unsustainable due to lack of material evidence. The Tribunal directed the original authority to furnish necessary details and evidence, allowing the appellant a fair chance to defend their position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=519518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 554 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359990</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Service Tax demand of &amp;amp;8377; 5,32,526/- against the appellant for errection commissioning services provided to M/s. IOCL for establishing Petrol Pumps. The Tribunal found that the authorities failed to provide specific work orders or evidence of services rendered, placing the burden of proof incorrectly on the appellant. Emphasizing the principle that the burden of proof rests with the alleging party, the Tribunal deemed the order unsustainable due to lack of material evidence. The Tribunal directed the original authority to furnish necessary details and evidence, allowing the appellant a fair chance to defend their position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>