2018 (3) TMI 314

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Respondent/Defendant (hereinafter, "Defendant‟) was directed to be served through publication vide order dated 22nd January, 2018. None appears for the Defendant and they are proceeded ex-parte. 3. Copy of the publication is taken on record. 4. This is an appeal against the impugned order dated 16th May, 2014 by which the Trial Court has dismissed the suit for recovery of Rs. 3,26,235.58/. The Plaintiff's case is that he had given a loan of Rs. 3 lakhs to the Defendant, in cash, on 1st April, 2008. When the Plaintiff demanded repayment of the loan, the Defendant is alleged to have executed a written agreement/receipt in the presence of two witnesses. Subsequently, the Plaintiff had also issued a legal notice on 23rd September, 2008....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rs. At present, I am residing at H. No. I-40A, Gali No. 10, Braham Puri, Delhi from last 4-5 months. On 22.07.2011, I was not residing at the address at H. No. 71, Gali No. 3, Braham Puri. I can not tell the contents of my affidavit Ex.DW1/A. I can not tell the exact place where my signatures were taken by my counsel on the affidavit at points A and B. It is incorrect that I was purchased the plot no. F-94, Rana Chowk, Ram Park, Loni Ghaziabad, UP in the name of my wife Smt. Guddi. It is incorrect to suggest that I have sold the house at present. It is correct that I was residing in front of the house of plaintiff at the time of taking the loan from plaintiff. It is correct that relation between me and plaintiff are good in the year of 2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... could have been given in cash, so the loan transaction is not liable to be recognised. In so far as this is concerned, Sections 269SS and 269T do make it compulsory for persons who accept loan or deposits of about Rs. 20,000/- to accept them only through proper banking channels. The consequence of not doing so could fasten the parties with penalties under the Income Tax Act, 1961 which the Court is not concerned with in these proceedings. The Plaintiff and the Defendant could be in violation of the said provisions which would be gone into by the Income Tax Authorities. Authorities are free to take action against the parties for violation of the provisions of the said Act. Under instructions from the Plaintiff, counsel for the Plaintiff sub....