<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 314 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356611</link>
    <description>The Appellant sought delay condonation due to Plaintiff&#039;s jaundice. The Defendant proceeded ex-parte in a loan recovery suit where the Plaintiff alleged a loan agreement and legal notice. Witness testimonies and lack of evidence weakened the Defendant&#039;s case. The Trial Court erred in dismissing the suit based on Income Tax Act provisions, as the violation fell under tax authorities&#039; purview. The Defendant&#039;s admission and evidence supported the Plaintiff&#039;s claim, resulting in a decree for the Plaintiff for the loan amount with interest. The appeal was allowed with no costs, emphasizing evidence and legal compliance in loan recovery suits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 17:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=511738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 314 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356611</link>
      <description>The Appellant sought delay condonation due to Plaintiff&#039;s jaundice. The Defendant proceeded ex-parte in a loan recovery suit where the Plaintiff alleged a loan agreement and legal notice. Witness testimonies and lack of evidence weakened the Defendant&#039;s case. The Trial Court erred in dismissing the suit based on Income Tax Act provisions, as the violation fell under tax authorities&#039; purview. The Defendant&#039;s admission and evidence supported the Plaintiff&#039;s claim, resulting in a decree for the Plaintiff for the loan amount with interest. The appeal was allowed with no costs, emphasizing evidence and legal compliance in loan recovery suits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>