1979 (7) TMI 247
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nt: Y.S. Chitale, M.V. Goswami and Ambrish Kumar, Advs. ORDER N.L. Untwalia, J. 1. The plaintiff-appellant filed a suit in the Trial Court in the year 1963 alleging certain unjustifiable and illegal actions on the part of his employer, the respondent in this appeal. The reliefs claimed in the suit were the following :- (a) That it may be declared that the defendant has removed th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e appellant took the matter in appeal before the First Appellate Court. It allowed the appeal and held that the dispute raised was of a civil nature and the case was cognizable by a Civil Court. The respondent filed the second appeal in the High Court and the High Court has agreed with the view of the Trial Court. It has said that the appellant had not claimed damages by pleading wrongful dismissa....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....re are a number of decisions of this Court to that effect; to wit-Dr. S.B. Dutt v. University of Delhi [1959]1SCR1236 ; S. R. Tiwari v. District Board Agra and Anr. (1964)ILLJ1SC and Indian Airlines Corporation v. Suhhdeo Rai. [1971] Suppl. S.C.R. 510 Reference was also be made in this connection to the decision of this Court in Premier Automobiles Ltd. v. Kamlekar Shantaram Wadke of Bombay and Or....
TaxTMI