2018 (2) TMI 1388
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ra, President And Mr. B Ravichandaran, Member (Technical) None for the Appellants Shri R K Mishra, DR for the Respondent ORDER Per: (Dr.) Satish Chandra All three appeals were filed against common order of Commissioner dated 30.11.09 where adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of Central Excise duty and also levied the penalty. 2. Being aggrieved the appellants have filed separate appe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rtaining to pre-deposit. The Tribunal vide its order dated 1.9.14 has reduced the penalty amount to 50% pertaining to the appellant M/s. Supreme Trading Co., Supreme Road Transport Pvt. Ltd. and Shri Ravi Singhal (individual), within a period of six weeks. But appellants failed to deposit the said amount within the prescribed time. So Tribunal vide order dated 9.12.2014 dismissed all the appeals. ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e its order dated 1.03.2016. 8. Again party filed the SLP before the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 1.4.2016 praying for extension of time for pre-deposit but the Hon'ble Supreme Court vide its order dated 25.4.2016 dismissed all the appeals with cost. 9. Still not being satisfied with the order of Hon'ble Supreme Court, the appellant again approached the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi wh....