https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355967 The appeals were dismissed due to the failure to make mandatory pre-deposit under section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite multiple attempts and appeals to various courts, including the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court, the appellants were unable to comply with the pre-deposit requirement. The Supreme Court eventually dismissed all three civil appeals, and subsequent applications for extension of time for pre-deposit were also unsuccessful. The appellants' last attempt to offer a bank guarantee towards penalty payment was withdrawn, leading to the dismissal of their applications for restoration of appeals by the Tribunal. en-us Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Feb 2018 06:39:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355967 The appeals were dismissed due to the failure to make mandatory pre-deposit under section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite multiple attempts and appeals to various courts, including the Delhi High Court and the Supreme Court, the appellants were unable to comply with the pre-deposit requirement. The Supreme Court eventually dismissed all three civil appeals, and subsequent applications for extension of time for pre-deposit were also unsuccessful. The appellants' last attempt to offer a bank guarantee towards penalty payment was withdrawn, leading to the dismissal of their applications for restoration of appeals by the Tribunal. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 05 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355967