2018 (2) TMI 1165
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... ORDER Heard Mr.S.Ramanathan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and M/s.G.Dhana Madhri, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent. 2.The petitioner who is the registered dealer on the file of the respondent under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax, 2006, (TNVAT Act) and the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (CST Act) is aggrieved by the impugned notices d....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rtment. 4.The learned Government Advocate has produced the written instructions given by the respondent to the learned Special Government Pleader vide communication dated 11.02.2014. In the said para-wise comments, it has been mentioned that notice was issued to the petitioner to cause production of connected original bills and proof of payment of tax. 5.The learned counsel for the petitione....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....duce those records. This notice dated 13.09.2013 was issued after the writ petition was filed and an order of stay was granted on 16.08.2013. Therefore, the petitioner appears to have not acted in furtherance to the amended notice dated 13.09.2013. Since the respondent has himself realized the mistake and issued a modified notice, the impugned notices cannot be enforced. 7.Accordingly, the writ....
TaxTMI