<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1165 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355744</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, set aside the impugned orders denying input tax credit and demanding penalty, and directed the respondent to re-issue a notice dated 13.09.2013. The petitioner was granted time to produce records and objections, with an opportunity for a personal hearing, in accordance with the law. No costs were awarded, and connected Miscellaneous Petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 08:34:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1165 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355744</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, set aside the impugned orders denying input tax credit and demanding penalty, and directed the respondent to re-issue a notice dated 13.09.2013. The petitioner was granted time to produce records and objections, with an opportunity for a personal hearing, in accordance with the law. No costs were awarded, and connected Miscellaneous Petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>