2018 (2) TMI 1105

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Raju 1. This appeal has been filed by M/s. Mahanagar Gas Ltd., against denial of refund of Central Excise duty paid by them. 2. Ld. Counsel for the appellant argued that they are engaged in supplying gas to various oil marketing companies. In the process of supply they gives certain trade discounts to the said companies. The trade discount was revised with retrospective effect and as a resul....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f which were admitted by the appellants. He pointed out that the appellants had admitted the following: i) OMCs have adjusted credit note amount in their subsequent invoices and paid balance (net of credit note value) ii) Credit note is not co-relatable because it's pertains to both zones. 3.1 He argued that in these circumstances, it is not possible to co-relate the credit notes with the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellant relied upon to seek remand is a case where the appellant had supplied goods to BEST which is a consumer of gas and could not have passed the burden of excise duty to anybody else directly. In the instant case the buyers are oil marketing companies who directly transferred the burden of excise to their consumers. Thus, the fact in the two cases are considerably different. In the first case....