<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1105 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355684</link>
    <description>The appeal against the denial of a refund of Central Excise duty based on trade discounts was dismissed by the Tribunal. The appellant&#039;s argument for the refund was based on the issuance of credit notes for the differential amount of trade discount, but the Revenue pointed out discrepancies in the adjustment of credit note amounts by buyers and the lack of co-relatability to specific consignments. The Tribunal emphasized that only trade discounts known at the time of clearance are admissible deductions and that variations post-clearance require provisional assessment. The decision highlights the importance of clarity in trade discounts, the relevance of credit notes for unjust enrichment discharge, and the necessity of provisional assessment for uncertain transaction values.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2018 06:41:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=509399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1105 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355684</link>
      <description>The appeal against the denial of a refund of Central Excise duty based on trade discounts was dismissed by the Tribunal. The appellant&#039;s argument for the refund was based on the issuance of credit notes for the differential amount of trade discount, but the Revenue pointed out discrepancies in the adjustment of credit note amounts by buyers and the lack of co-relatability to specific consignments. The Tribunal emphasized that only trade discounts known at the time of clearance are admissible deductions and that variations post-clearance require provisional assessment. The decision highlights the importance of clarity in trade discounts, the relevance of credit notes for unjust enrichment discharge, and the necessity of provisional assessment for uncertain transaction values.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=355684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>