2011 (9) TMI 1164

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the Respondent. JUDGMENT In this appeal filed by the appellant, the appellant is raising following two questions of law, which according to him are the main questions of law or of public importance :- (1) Whether the order passed by the Hon'ble Tribunal only on the basis of a letter submitted by the Advocate before the Hon'ble Tribunal, withou....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed goods, etc., lying in the factory premises was made and panchnama dated 26th July, 2005 was drawn on the spot. On the basis of the said physical stock taking, a show cause notice dated 25th January, 2006 was served upon the petitioner by the Deputy Commissioner, Central Excise, Delhi-I, alleging therein that some finished goods were found short and there was shortage of raw material. Though, se....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s. In these circumstances, the case was taken up for hearing on 13th January, 2011. When nobody appeared on behalf of the appellant, however, taking into consideration the request made in the aforesaid letter, the Tribunal proceeded with the matter and after hearing departmental representative dismissed the appeal vide impugned order dated 12th January, 2011. 5. It is argued that the appel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppellant explaining the duty in the finished goods which was pointed out in the show cause notice by the adjudicating authority. He also argued that though this defence of the appellant was taken note of, it was not considered by the adjudicating authority in proper prospective and some error was made by the CIT(A) also. 8. Though, we are not commenting upon the aforesaid defence of the ap....